Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stadler Form


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 01:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Stadler Form

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references are available or proven, article contains too much advertising and it doesn't look like an encyclopedic entry. The company has no information about their sales and it is doubtful that relevance is generated here. –SDKmac (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I've fixed your nomination, which did not follow the instructions at . Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 10:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG Article about a swiss company, without an article on Swiss Wikipedia. There are no claims of notablity, my search for references did not find anything showing notability. Jeepday (talk) 16:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is written like an advert and contains zero references. I couldn't find anything in a WP:BEFORE either. Except for a product reviews. Which aren't enough to pass WP:NORG. So this company clearly isn't notable. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.