Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staeta (Soy Milk)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is to delete, but if the creator wishes this to have this userfied, contact me and I will do so --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 22:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Staeta (Soy Milk)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article appears to fail WP:PRODUCT. The information appears highly promotional, the references appear mostly promotional and a product article like this should be merged into an article on the company itself unless the company article is too large. As there is no article on ProSoya Foods (India), this does not seem to apply. The article is sourced and well structured so raising for discussion rather than PROD. Fæ (talk) 20:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 20:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - The PR team (woops, I mean user) that his article was failing in certain wiki areas - mostly WP:npov - all they did was remove my clean up template. Peter.C  •  talk  00:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable product.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete There is already an article, Soy milk, which covers the subject. This article is no more than a promotion for a particular brand, as evidenced by the references, which all point to the company product. Peter.C has it nailed. This one needs to go unless WP is moving to display ads. Geoff  Who, me?  22:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Request assistance Hey guys, the page was created for a real and legitimate single product company that exists in India that supplies Staeta Soy Milk. But I truly appreciate your concern that it doesn't conform to Wiki standards. I would request you to point out the specific changes needed and I will make all the necessary changes and hope that the article will then conform to the said standards. Thanks for pointing the errors out.-- Sudeep88 (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * (comment) If delete goes ahead then I suggest a copy is userfied for Sundeep88, possibly for them to merge some details into Soy milk, if rewriting does not sufficiently address the issues. Fæ (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has been re-written keeping in mind the points that have been raised on this discussion. Request to please review the article again and indicate which issues still need to be addressed to conform to wiki standards. Sudeep88 (talk) 06:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Reference of the book by has been added that shows that the brand is not a non-notable product. In fact, the brand has been launched by the Indian operations of the Canadian firm, ProSoya Inc. - Sudeep88 (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sudeep, the convention is to only contribute one !vote in a AfD discussion, I have altered your comment format in line with WP:RTP. I can see you are trying hard to find sources, good work. My recommendation for Userfication still applies so that you can continue on a draft document. Fæ (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been reading that notable brands and organization are allowed to have wikipedia pages. Can I get some feedback as to whether the article is now fine with regards to the Wikipedia standards? Or does it need more work? - Sudeep88 (talk) 07:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll follow-up on your talk page. Fæ (talk) 07:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.