Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stafford Leys Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Leicester Forest East. Coverage is only from The Leicester Mercury, and any local school would expect coverage in such media. Otherwise, appears to be an unremarkable primary; the NHSS and IIS awards are shared by thousands of such schools. Black Kite 01:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Stafford Leys Primary School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable primary school, contested PROD. PROD notice was moved without discussion. School is not outstanding per its last ofsted report and has no redeeming features that would make it notable.  role player 18:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Seeing further discussion below I am happy to concur with a merge and redirect to the appropriate locality for this school. --  role player 01:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable primary school, it's generally taken that whilst secondary schools should have their own article it is not with regard to primaries.Paste (talk) 18:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Reading below Merge to Leicester Forest East seems eminently sensible.Paste (talk) 20:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete regardless of how fascinating it might be that their day is divided into pre-break, post-break, and post-lunch periods. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to Leicester Forest East per common practice. Primary schools are generally not notable and this one doesn't appear to be an exception. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Leicester Forest East, where it can be discussed in context and await significant coverage in reliable sources to justify an independent article. Double Blue  (Talk) 19:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Update to Keep per WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and WP:N. Now has references to sourcing. Double Blue  (Talk) 22:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Leicester Forest East per usual practice. TerriersFan (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the expansion of the page now means that it meets WP:N with multiple, independent sources. TerriersFan (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to appropriate school area. - Mgm|(talk) 20:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject of substantial third party coverage.  I see no reason to override WP:N in this case. Wily D  21:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Leicester Forest East. The conventional view is that secondary schools usually are notable and should have theri own articles; primary schools usually are not and should be briefly mentioned under the place where they are.  The fact that there is independent coverage does not affect that.  A summary of the material can usefully be incorporated in to the village article, which means that it will not be lost to WP.  The Schools section in this case is excessively terse, so that the merger will improve that article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.