Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stage compiler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 06:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Stage compiler

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The term "stage compiler" seems to have been made up by ; it gets no relevant Google hits. I don't have any experience with Prolog; maybe someone can shed some light on that aspect. However, it sounds like the writer meant either "multi-pass compiler" or "bytecode compiler". Quuxplusone 03:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:V. Nothing in Google Books either (except references to "two-stage compiler" or "three-stage compiler"). I would suggest a merge but I don't think it's clear that either of the two articles Quuxplusone lists are more appropriate. --Dhartung | Talk 07:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not in any of my available references on compiler design. JulesH 17:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, if this compiler can't be verified by multiple perspectives on the internet. Then I can also say that it is not notable, and shouldn't be here.--Kylohk 22:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.