Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stages of spiritual development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Stages of spiritual development

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems like a rather non-notable book. Specifically fails WP:BK via:


 * The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary.

Further, I've used 3 different searches and can't find a review and/or other source of verifiability/notability.  Digital Ninja WTF 20:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per and p. 41 of, but restrict the article to content that can actually be sourced. Cosmic Latte (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * On second thought, Merge verifiable elements, and redirect to Psychology Counseling psychology, per the sources I provided above. Cosmic Latte (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  __meco (talk) 09:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete not a book, a chapter published in a book, and no evidence of notability for this particular concept. An attempt to recycle a published paper into a wikipedia article.DGG (talk) 03:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.