Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stagnation Increment in CPSEs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Stagnation Increment in CPSEs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see what criteria of inclusion this meets. It is a bunch of facts regarding pay level for public enterprises in India, but that isn't exactly encyclopedic by itself. Dennis 2&cent; 18:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   20:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find any reliable secondary sources, so the subject seems to fail notability per WP:GNG. Without reliable secondary sources discussing history, controversies, cultural impact, etc., of these pay level rules, we cannot build a neutral, informative article. --Mark viking (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is a trivial list of trivial pay raises that uses trivial primary sources. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.