Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalk of KAL 007


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone wants the content to try and get it onto Wikisource, let me or any other admin know. Neıl 龱  10:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Stalk of KAL 007

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary content fork which is mostly a transcript. The series of events leading to the downing of KAL 007 is better covered in the main article. If possible this should be added to Wikisource, but afterwards should be deleted.

I'm also nominating the following pages for the same reasons:


 * KAL 007: Inside the Cockpit

Guycalledryan (talk) 10:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

It is true that these articles contain transcripts but my own intros and some of my comments are also included. But the fact that these is not one comtinuous transcripts but my joining of transcripts, with my deletions of extraneous material - such as fuel readouts, interspersed "fasten seatbelts" announcements in the three languages, etc. might be more telling. I had thought about, as you have suggested, placing the articles contents in the body of the main article, but decided against it because of the length this would bring the main article to. Yet, the material is certainly enhancing to a full understanding of eventsBert Schlossberg (talk) 11:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom - better of as a linked source, any other material is self declared Original Research. MilborneOne (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the transcripts are public domain they may go to WikiSource. These articles are synthesis of primary sources. --Dhartung | Talk 22:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-encyclopedic Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Opinion - Even though the article will be deleted, the content should be preserved. Transferring the article to WikiSource is a good idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chulk90 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.