Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalwartbucks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Stalwartbucks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG as a currency created as a joke/experiment with no legitimate uses. No coverage besides from its creator.  Konveyor   Belt  17:44, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable by any standard. Stalwartbucks is discussed in detail in a single “article”/post written by the currency's creator in Business Insider, which I'd contend is a blog rather than a reliable news source, and it was briefly mentioned in an opinion (not news) piece in Bloomberg, which was also syndicated to the Boston Globe. I think this Wikipedia article would meet the promotional standards for a Speedy Delete, but I don't want to spend the time to check all the details and figure out how to do that. There are dozens of new cryptocurrencies created each week, and Stalwartbucks is an example of one that's custom-created by a third party for under $10. ––Agyle (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.