Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staminier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G7. NaughtyNuggles and A Higher Authority were blocked for socking. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Staminier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Coverage does not meet WP:NCORP, the only independent secondary coverage that I was able to find is WP:ROUTINE business press. Most of the currently cited sources are primary. signed,Rosguill talk 23:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

t — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Higher Authority (talk • contribs) 00:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Staminier is an acquisitive corporation, involved in business and the stockmarket - only two of the sources used are from the company, one of which being "areas of expertise". The links to Gatwick development has seen coverage by indepednednt non routine sources (eg air 101 etc) and its deal with Berkshire Hathaway shares make it a noteworthy situation, particularly in the light of the Heathrow issues and the expansion of Gatwick. signed,A Higher Authority talk —Preceding undated comment added 00:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * A Higher Authority: Press releases by the company that are reprinted elsewhere are not independent sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. --MarioGom (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * MarioGom: your right, but they add to the independent sources that there are, to show that its noteworthy. --A Higher Authority (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * A Higher Authority Which independent sources? I cannot see them. --MarioGom (talk) 07:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Actually this version of the article was never rejected, it is very different to the one that got rejected. With the previous two rejections, points were taken on board and the the article has changed significantly. There was only a 1/4 the number of references and the layout was totally different. --A Higher Authority (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. And draftify immediately. This article was submitted as a draft by A Higher Authority and rejected multiple times. Then User:NaughtyNuggles moved the draft to the main namespace. --MarioGom (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter. After the initial rejections you just decided to bypass the process instead of submitting for review again. --MarioGom (talk) 11:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

I did submit for review again. only this time instead of taking a single day to respond (like the previous 3 times), i hadn't had a response after weeks (possibly because the changes I made were credible?), even after going to both admins talk pages. In regard to some of the sources used; ie the press releases published by bloomberg, yahoo, businesswire ect, each one is approved (“FSMA”) by London Court Limited who are totally independent. Which means all the information in the article has been verified. Your point is valid, I get where you're coming from, my point is that since the information has been verified by an independent source we can take use this information on top of the independent sources to show it is noteworthy (eg the air101 article ect). Especially considering how large the projects are. --A Higher Authority (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Press releases are by definition not independent. For more elaboration, see the second subsection of WP:ORGIND. signed,Rosguill talk 17:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

How do i delete my article? --NaughtyNuggles (talk) 20:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Notifying previous reviewers, who may have missed the draft move: Sulfurboy, SamHolt6. --MarioGom (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , if after a week the consensus of this discussion is to delete the article, an uninvolved administrator will take care of it. signed,Rosguill talk 21:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.