Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Krome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Stan Krome
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an orphan page that reads like a resume. None of the sources listed show notability or even mention the subject. Cleanup tags have been repeatedly removed by a couple SPAs. Edward321 (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 14:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF – e.g., zero hits on Google Scholar and Google Books. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO either, with only two hits on Google News.--Eric Yurken (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is little more than a laundry list of the subjects this individual has taught in an extension program, how he's a "professional communicator", and what local radio stations he's worked for – it doesn't really even make any strong claims of notability, so I guess it's not terribly surprising that none have been found. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. i found, and , but these are announcements that the paper prints from anybody submitting them so they are more in the way of a press release. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence or likelihood of passing WP:PROF, and the notability-by-inheritence argument that he's designed websites for notable people doesn't fly. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.