Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Lee (Judge Dredd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Stan Lee (Judge Dredd)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Support deletion as per Piotrus' reasons. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. 08:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics-related deletion discussions. 08:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or at worst Fully Merge to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Deleting information serves no useful purpose even if a standalone article is not kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * "Deleting information serves no useful purpose even if a standalone article is not kept" - with this argument we wouldn't be deleting anything. I could write an article about my pet armadillo and use this argument to defend it... see also WP:ITSHARMLESS, WP:ITSUSEFUL. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Please try not to be obtuse. Your pet armadillo is not known to many thousands of people. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Non0-encyclopedic information should be deleted. --Nicknack009 (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no indication that this character has been discussed by journalists or academics. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 13:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.