Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Jojo's Bizarre Adventure. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Tagged for merge back on 3/25 and ain't nobody doing it. No secondary sources, far too much indiscriminate info; what little is verifiable is already mentioned in target. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I still say copy the relevant pieces to the several articles where they belong and redirect to Jojo's Bizarre Adventure. I am not myself familiar enough with the source material to do it myself, though. —Quasirandom (talk) 13:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The lack of merging seems to evidence that no one really cares that this article is still here, if it were a hindrance to the encyclopedia something would've been done a while ago. In fact, why does this AfD exist? Why didn't Ten Pound Hammer commence the merging, the "consensus"-chosen option instead of firing up another discussion that'll end the same way? - Norse Am Legend (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jojo's Bizarre Adventure. Apparently, there wasn't anything really worth merging into the other articles. However, in the even that an editor wants to merge some of the info, the edit history should be left intact an retrievable. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jojo's Bizarre Adventure Nothing has been merged from here and it has been months, in that time someone could have just as easily looked up the info reguarding the subject and placed it into the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect and close. Consensus was to not have a separate article, but still to retain some of the info. Redirecting now complies with the old consensus, and the problem (a bad article) is solved. – sgeureka t•c 09:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Sgeureka. Old consensus made sense and no one has addressed the topic in a way that would make for a stand alone article. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.