Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard Predictor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Standard Predictor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Wunderkidding (talk) 16:47, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete (from nominator). Article is an advertising piece written by the creator of the test being advertised. No secondary sources to support GNG, and the primary sources on the page are (non-peer reviewed) WP:SPS's, again written by the creator of the test being advertised. Wunderkidding (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:GNG - Does not meet the general notability criteria. Only 17 hits on google, the first and second reference in the article are not neutral, the third reference does not mention the subject. Considering the name of the author, it is self-promotion. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I'm assuming that this is a good faith effort at detecting those at risk of violence but this is clearly part of a promotional effort. Also, many of the names listed as coauthors in the refs and the text of the Clarke quote are from testimonials at standardpredictor.com. There doesn't seem to be independent verification that the assessment is accepted and widely used. --mikeu talk 22:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.