Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standerbacking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Standerbacking

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. I wanted to tag this for speedy deletion, but I couldn't find any that would apply. This is a neologism with nothing, and I mean literally nothing on Google. I really hate to waste time on a full AFD discussion. Would it be appropriate to tag this under G1? J.delanoy gabs adds 16:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. J.delanoy gabs adds  16:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Probably not G1, but definitely DICT. Livitup (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary D0762 (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Hut 8.5 19:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this neologism is very non-notable if it even exists. —  Wen li  (reply here) 23:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Im not really sure where to reply to the pending deletion notice as there are no 'reply' buttons anywhere - such a complicated un-userfriendly interface but thats another story..

So please dont delete this fledging article, others will be adding more meat to the bone as it were.

Where would we be if all new things were summarily deleted!

pom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomalllka (talk • contribs) on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Standerbacking at 21:13, June 30, 2008. Moved from talk page by J.delanoy gabs adds  23:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not only is wikipidia not a dictionary it would appear by the lack of google hits that this is a totally made up word (as is hinted at in the article itself. Dpmuk (talk) 00:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 04:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.