Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanford Open Source Lab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  05:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Stanford Open Source Lab

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an article at all. It consists of one line of explanatory contents and a list of mostly red links. It does not have any sources and does not establish its own notability. Maybe it does better as a category. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Codename Lisa (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge with Stanford University. It appears notable enough for a section, but not enough for an article. However, sources still need to be added. United States Man (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Could be merged/redirected to Stanford University, but I'm not sure where in the article to put it - because the information at this article and at the University's own website is very unclear about what kind of "lab" it is. My hunch it is a student or student/faculty group, rather than part of the University's academic programs, and too minor to mention at the University article. --MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with MelanieN. I cannot find any indication that this is an academic / research initiative.  It seems mode like a campus club. -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.