Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Berryhill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Stanley Berryhill

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance. Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football,  and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 07:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the general notability guideline with "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see the following articles that cover Berryhill "directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content,": this very in-depth article from Arizona Republic; this from the Arizona Daily Star; this from the Daily Star; this from the Daily Star; this from Tuscon.com; and this from Tuscon.com. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per BeanieFan11's sources. Think this one meets GNG pretty easily. SPF121188  (talk this way) (contribs) 20:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of sources to meet GNG. Notability depends on available sources, not just the sources in the article at the time of nomination. Rlendog (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm copying my rationale from Articles for deletion/Tay Martin because it's an identical situation even down to the editor who provided the sources: This is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. - Aoidh (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment- It may be snowing, even if it's a light flurry. SPF121188  (talk this way) (contribs) 19:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.