Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Page (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Stanley Page
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No improvement since this was previously up for AfD and almost deleted in 2019. Search in British Newspaper Archive in the 1930s did not yield any significant coverage so the WP:GNG concern is still present. Does not meet criteria for a redirect to List of Mansfield Town F.C. players as has not played 50 games or scored 25 goals for them. Comprehensive searches were already conducted by User:HawkAussie and User:Malcolmxl5 in the previous discussion but these were neutralised by comments saying that Page should be kept due to meeting WP:FOOTYN, which has since been deprecated. I, therefore, believe that a 2nd AfD is a reasonable request. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Barely passed the previous NFOOTY guideline with a single barely professional match in Football League Third Division North Cup that ended in a lopsided 8-1, and could've been deleted even under the previous NFOOTY. Does not pass GNG. -- Mvqr (talk) 10:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Voting the same as in the last AfD. I never saw this as a GNG pass. Govvy (talk) 20:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see I left a lengthy argument for deletion in the previous Afd. That still stands. I've made further searches and have come up with nothing. Fails WP:GNG. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the others. This is an easy call. It’s not even close to meeting the GNG for BLP article inclusion. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.