Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley William Moore II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Stanley William Moore II


Appears non-notable: I could not find any reliable source that is independent on the subject and backs up what's written in there. Tizio 17:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find any independent sources either; unless they're found, it can't be kept. Trebor 19:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I listed the page for deletion because there are no independent sources available for this artist. Simple high school art students aren't notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. 71.19.6.223 22:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Was about to nominate this myself once the Übersite AfD concludes, but it's all the same. Okay, let's see: The artwork in question was covered in a Digg article. Got a few hundred diggs and some comments. Umm... that's about that. That's still probably not enough of fame to get an article; I'm not familiar enough with Digg culture, but I'd definitely say "delete" on someone who's been subject of one Slashdot story, you know, the kind of story that would get tagged "slownewsday" these days. =) (Getting your project to Slashdot would make your project vaguely notable, but not necessarily you...) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.