Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stannary Hills Dam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Irvinebank. ✗ plicit  00:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Stannary Hills Dam

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unreferenced since 2009. Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE. Gbooks, GNews, internet archive, JStor (etc.) all negative (weirdly I get a hit for a Guardian photo-essay but the name isn't actually mentioned on the page so maybe this is a meta-data thing). I guess people have been keeping this because "there must be sources" but sometimes there just aren't any. Considered redirects/merges but there's no obvious target nor any sourced information to actually merge. FOARP (talk) 13:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Irvinebank. Subject not notable in its own right but is a possible search term, the dam being of interest to trekkers, historians, mining enthusiasts, etc.  Was related to the now defunct township / mining district of Stannary Hills, Queensland, which redirects to Irvinebank.  Aoziwe (talk) 13:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Checking the map I see Irvinebank is about 20km away, but I'm basically OK with a redirect as well per WP:CHEAP. FOARP (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.