Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanno tutti bene (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Stanno tutti bene (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced album. Programming G E E K (mah page! // use words to communicate page) 12:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Link to discogs.com. -- Dimitrij  Kášëv  12:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete unless this can also be Redirected to the subject's own article since this album itself is questionably independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I checked some Italian sources but found nothing about this album. It would be hard to search anyway because the title is a very common phrase. I also looked at the WP article for the musician, and it has only one -- very poor -- source, and has huge lists of unsourced works and performances. I marked it as needing sources, and it may be possible to find them in the Italian press, but it will be very difficult to do from outside of that country. Note, the Italian article is very long and detailed, and only cites AllMusic and MTV, so there's nothing to borrow from them. Also, to User:Dimitrij Kasev, Discogs not a reliable source because, like IMDB or even Wikipedia, it is crowd-sourced. LaMona (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * user:LaMona, sorry for my English. I don't understand which sources I bring: "Stanno tutti bene" (2012) is the last "full album in studio" released by Bassi Maestro: a short record in Italian article, a review on rapburger.com, another review in Italian. -- Dimitrij  Kášëv  11:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Dimitrij Kasev, @en Wikipedia has a rather strict set of policies about sources. These are at wp:rs. Any sources must meet those criteria. For example, Rapburger says: "Sei un appassionato di hip hop, di rap o del mondo urban? Allora collaborare con RapBurger potrebbe essere la tua oppurtunità." This implies that some of the reviews are written by people who do not work for the site. Acceptable reviews should be by professional writers. The review for Stanno Tutti Bene is by someone who is not listed in the staff list of the site. The HipHopMN review may be acceptable, but that gives you only one viable source. (Devo dire che anche per musica americana o inglese e' difficile trovare fonti accettabili per la music "indie"; trovarli per musica indie di altri paesi e' praticamente impossibile. A lo stesso tempo, WP non e' un sito per l'elenco di tutta la musica in giro, come AllMusic o Discogs. E' un enciclopedia, e allora ha uno scopo diverso. Capisci?) LaMona (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * User:LaMona, understood and thanks for the explanation. But, this aren't a ordinary album of a ordinary rapper, that is what I mean. Can you checked myhiphop.it? Tracks and review. -- Dimitrij  Kášëv  20:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * A tracklist is just ... a tracklist. So that doesn't help. And the "review" is an interview. While interviews can be used selectively for some facts, they don't confer notability. As it is, the page for the artist is very weak, with only one reference, so if you wish for him to remain in WP @en it would be most productive to find -- and add to the page -- reliable sources about the artist. Otherwise, it is possible that page could also be deleted. LaMona (talk) 22:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - the issue is not that it's unsourced, but that it's currently unsourceable. Well done LaMona, we aren't trying to bite the newbies, just to do things properly. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. I couldn't find any reliable sources that cover this album in-depth (and definitely not enough where significant coverage exists) - which are requirements for meeting WP:GNG. This album also appears to fail WP:NALBUM.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.