Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanton LaVey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  00:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Stanton LaVey
Being related to someone notable does not confer notability. This is the grandson of someone famous, who does not have any apparent notability himself. D e nni &#9775;  23:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * See also his fiancee,  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 18:28Z 


 * Delete this article about the "only grandchild of Anton LaVey" Ruby 00:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as we should strongly do when one of the external links is to the subject's myspace. Daniel Case 05:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Barely escapes speedy for no claim of notability, but does claim to have been a magazine, with what is apparently a sneaky but irrelevant wikilink to L.A. Weekly when he appeared in a different, non-notable magazine that happens to be printed weekly in LA. --Malthusian (talk) 12:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable biography. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 18:20Z 
 * Delete Non-notable. I find his fiance more notable than he his. Ifnord 21:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * While I agree with Ifnord that a hula-hooping go-go dancer is more notable than her fiance. Delete--Gillespee 06:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.