Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staple Gun

Dictdef. I can't see how it can be broadened out. Geogre 16:28, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I guess the article could discuss the history of staple guns, the principles by which they work, major manufacturers, pop-culture references... Having said all that, I don't think we'd lose much by deleting it. Harry R 16:54, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Could be expanded.  A job for cleanup, not delete. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:23, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * You could add the DictDef to Wikitionary...but I think this is more of a cleanup job. Ilyanep 17:33, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Could be expanded to a real article. Thue 18:17, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, will never grow out of substub stage. Wyllium 19:58, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless stub, will never be expanded upon.Marlowe[[user Talk:Destinova|²]] 22:06, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Heaven knows I tried to give this the benefit of the doubt, but I just can't see this expanding either. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 00:56, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't see it expaning - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  06:20, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - stop standing around saying it won't expand, expand it. So it was. (Though not by me) Burgundavia 08:58, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Was "keep", now "keep". User:Jorge_Stolfi has shown  that this article can be and has been expanded on.    &mdash; Lady Lysine Ikinsile 08:59, 2004 Jun 19 (UTC)
 * Keep, of course. BTW, what is the correct word for the stapler's "anvil"? Jorge Stolfi 09:01, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep! A great article. And you said it couldn't expand :P DO'Neil 09:19, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, people are far to quick to assume subjects do not deserve a full article. - SimonP 13:40, Jun 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid topic for any encyclopedia of tools. Davodd 04:41, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Wow! I generally don't like to be proven wrong, but this is one time I'm glad I was.  Withdraw delete vote. - Lucky 6.9 04:50, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've removed the vfd tag & nomination.  I'm glad to be proven wrong. Geogre 12:17, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)