Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staqu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Staqu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one in-depth source, which is questionably reliable given language like "Staqu has a strong and experienced technical and design team to interface the research with the consumer in a seamless manner." Conifer (talk ) 07:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Could find no additional sources. Per Conifer, the only significant source does not appear sufficiently reliable - but even if it were, per WP:NCORP, A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization. BethNaught (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.