Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarGazer (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

StarGazer (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

well written but largely unsourced. the one inline source that is provided is a copy of this wikipedia article (or vice versa) and is not a reliable source, band bios are submited and edited by readers. the extenal links are ther own pages and a non reliable source. There is a lot of relaeses but no evidence they are on important labels. without independent coverage this does not satisfy wp:music. (the bands name made searching for sources less easy but using album or band members didn't help) duffbeerforme (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. They have a fairly substantial review at Allmusic, one at About.com which is questionable perhaps re. its reliability, and news items from Blabbermouth.net. Not totally convincing regarding notability, but getting there.--Michig (talk) 18:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: No decent sources available apart from two reviews and so cannot verify the article. No charting records in Australia and Generally not notable. Mattg82 (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.