Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarKingdoms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. I see that Ilyanep has made some trimming of the article so it should be OK right now. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

StarKingdoms
There has been some doubt over whether this page is an advertisement or not, I feel it should be discussed whether or not this page deserves to remain on here or not, notablity of website is in question, at the very least needs a thorough re-write IndigoNights 05:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey, I used to play this, long long ago. Damn this article is FAQy (not really advertising, just a lot of instruction-manual type info). As for the notability of the website itself, well... Its Alexa rank is awful, and I don't think it's grown at all since I last saw it (maybe 3-4 years ago). Giving it a weak delete for now. Nifboy 07:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It has a reasonably long and diverse edit history and from a Google search it doesn't look like a copy/paste job. --StuffOfInterest 13:43, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Sure looks like the introduction to the game and the rules, rather than an article about the game and its historical relevance. We get one very short paragraph that's like an encyclopedia article, and the rest is just how to play.  Wikipedia is not GameFAQs nor a how-to guide.  I recommend RFC for content and/or a collaboration to slice off the fat and build up the muscle, if the article is kept. Geogre 15:13, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - cos otherwise you'll have to delete Metal knights, which I created. Zordrac 01:46, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per StuffOfInterest. Stifle 22:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's pretty notable, however I am deleting all the copy and paste unwikified stuff from the manual to bring it back to the okay state it was in earlier. &mdash; Il&gamma;&alpha;&eta;&epsilon;&rho;   (T&alpha;l&kappa;)  00:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.