Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star (strategies + architecture)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Star (strategies + architecture)
Contested PROD. No evidence of meeting the criteria at WP:CORP; smells like advertising to me. Delete. Angr (talk • contribs) 17:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. No claims (let alone any proof) of notability. --P199 17:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advert. -- MarcoTolo 21:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As advertisment. Beno1000 15:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and note that page is badly named anyways (should be STAR (company) or Strategies and Architecture). TheProject 17:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 22:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.