Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Control: Origins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Star Control: Origins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON Meatsgains (talk) 00:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * KeepThis game is scheduled for release this year - meaning within seven months. It was announced years ago. It is not uncommon for games to have articles even a year before release. Traveurysm (talk) 01:16, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Traveurysm
 * This article covers a sequel in a widely-distributed game franchise, being published by a well-established game studio. Traveurysm (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Traveurysm
 * All other games in the franchise - and the franchise itself - have articles. Traveurysm (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Traveurysm
 * The articles has 4 citations, however I have not yet been able to remove the Citiations Needed tag because I'm still learning my way around Wikipedia. Traveurysm (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Traveurysm
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - a Google News shows plenty of coverage into the gameplay and development of the game from many RSes. It needs to be included, obviously, but it is there. --M ASEM (t) 01:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Also a keep: WP:VGRS search pops up at least a dozen announcement articles, an interview, and a longform preview, sufficient to indicate notability. There might be a reasonable argument this could be merged to one or another of the articles on another of the video games in the series, but I don't think that's necessary here. --Izno (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sufficient evidence of notability -- more than is usual for a prerelease game. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.