Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Fleet Battle Group Omega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - brenneman  {L} 03:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Star Fleet Battle Group Omega
Delete Starship battle group that never appeared on screen. That only featured in a few lines of dialogue and a computer display for a few seconds. The very model of non-notability. AlistairMcMillan 16:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 18:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ton e  19:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP -- Wiki ian
 * SO what? it is a still an event that is known to have happened in the fictional universe of Star Trek. there are dozens of articles that mention battle group omega(all of which i have now linked to the page). it also sheds light on the Valient and Archer which are heard very little of. And As Far as non-notability goes, have u even read half of the stubs in the star trek genre? they're a lot less notable than this article, which has a pic, external link, and links to the ships involved. Why is it so important to actually see something to have an article on it(especially when u know it happened/existed?) please help me understand. User:Wiki ian 15.30 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * KEEP per nom. -- Trekyman 16:24 20 May 2006 (UTC} -- I consider this to be an important article in the history of Star Trek, in my opinion a lot of other star trek articles should be deleted if this page is.
 * User with NO prior edits. AlistairMcMillan 09:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Keep per nom" is completely meaningless. "Per nom" means "for the same reason that the nominator had". The nominator is asking for deletion, so agreeing with his reasons would mean you want the page deleted. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge and/or redirect to Star Trek: Nemesis. -- Grev 09:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * How the heck can a fleeting glimpse of text on-screen in a movie be important to the history of Trek? If anything, this is a trivia entry for Star Trek: Nemesis. I agree with the nomination - Delete and/or merge with the Nemesis article. MikeWazowski 15:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Star Trek: Nemesis, probably worth mentioning there but not notable enough for a seperate article. BryanG 17:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, recommend Wiki ian see Memory Alpha for a Star Trek wiki. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I am aware of memory alpha existance, my argument is, what about unregistered users who dont know what memory alpha is, i only found out through a link in wiki, everyone from my local area has heard of wiki(its well known), while not many have heard of memory alpha. which is why i beleave if these articles dont deserve to be kept the informatiuon should at least be kept on other pages, Nemisis for example. talk Wiki ian 11:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, textbook fancruft. Sandstein 17:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, for god's sake. That list wasn't even meant to be looked at. It was filler. 86.143.156.110 17:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and transwiki to Memory Alpha the few words that aren't over there already. —phh (t/c) 15:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep If this article is fancruft as Sandstein states, then the entirety of Star Trek pages needs to be deleted. This was an onscreen piece of information that was quite readable by anyone who actualy bothered to read it.  The fact that it uses known ships from Trek history is proof that it was very much intended to be readable. Alyeska 23:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.