Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Infranet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Star Infranet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Τhe article fails WP:GNG in many ways: it has no significant coverage to be considered notable, references 3 & 4 are not reliable secondary sources as they are self-published material, reference 1 is obviously an advertisement (so collectively they are not independent of the subject) and source number 3 doesn't work. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 18:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 18:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 18:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete If the information in the article is correct - $100,000 in revenues and 50 employees - that would suggest very strongly a lack of notability. CorporateM (Talk) 16:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Multiple searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant and notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.