Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Parker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Star Parker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

One-time political candidate, failing WP:POLITICIAN, a syndicated columnist, author and co-host of The View for one day. I don't believe all of this combined meets WP:GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Fails WP:POLITICIAN, but nonetheless has more than enough secondary sources on google to pass WP:BASIC. Article should be cleaned up and expanded. Lionel (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete She got only 22.7% of the vote so she certainly fails WP:POLITICIAN. As for those "secondary sources" mentioned by Lionel, I'm not seeing them. Google News Archive finds things BY her, not about her. She writes a syndicated column, but that's not enough by itself to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Her books are published by Thomas Nelson, a Bible publisher which also has a self-publishing arm; self-published books fail WP:AUTHOR. Of the six references listed at the article, two are self-referential including her campaign website; one is just the secretary of state for the election results; the "Value Voters Summit" link is to the VVS webpage and does not mention her; the "KTTU" link is to the station's webpage, not to the article cited; the only thing that is actually a secondary source about her is the Christianity Today story, which is behind a registration wall but does appear to be about her. That alone does not add up to significant secondary coverage, so she fails WP:N based on what I am seeing. --MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsuccessful political candidate who fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  08:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG; can be WP:USERFY if article creator so wishes, if additional reliable source references can be found to support move into the main article space, so be it. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.