Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Patel

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 20:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Star Patel
Non-notable dog. Delete. For some reason I find this tribute very moving.-gadfium 01:48, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see how this dog deserves its own encyclopedia article. Zzyzx11 02:42, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to the memorial wiki, and thereby counter its systemic bias. GeorgeStepanek\talk  02:51, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I hope we don't hurt the author's feelings by deleting this, and it is a moving tribute, but unfortunately not an encyclopedia article. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 03:24, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * And a German Shepherd/Lab cross as well. Possibly my two favourite breeds of dog. There ought to be a proper memorial wiki for things like this. Does anyone know if Wikicities has one? &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 03:27, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the memorial wiki was specifically for memorials to people who had died in the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks. DaveTheRed 03:55, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup. That's quite a systemic bias there. GeorgeStepanek\talk  04:15, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Is it systemic bias to create a wiki with a narrow scope? If I created a wiki dedicated to square-shaped objects, would I be guilty of systemic bias because my wiki contained no articles on circular objects? DaveTheRed 05:01, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * It's called irony, honey. GeorgeStepanek\talk  06:04, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok honey, explain to me what part of this conversation is ironic, cause I sure don't see it. DaveTheRed 08:23, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * (Subsequently taken offline...)


 * Delete, not notable dog. Megan1967 04:32, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Weirdly enough I find this more sad than most of the human memorial articles I see here. It still can't stay though. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  15:25, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Awwwww. That's so sad. My condolences to the Patel family; Star sounds like he was a wonderful doggy. The article needs to be humanely put to sleep. DS 03:39, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Very sad, but still not notable. Delete. Jayjg (talk) 17:08, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Sad, but no, it doesn't belong here. Perhaps someone should suggest to the owner that he puts it on a page on his website. Otherwise I'll be tempted to add my old cat (1982-2000). Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 10:33, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Dog died, owner sad, this is not the place for it. --StoatBringer 12:25, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete If this was 1999, I would suggest an internet startup for ONLINE PET MEMORIALS! NASDAQ, here we come!  We're going to be rich!  --AStanhope 17:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.