Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Quest I: In the 27th Century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Star Quest I: In the 27th Century

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough. Poor resources. Knight rider best (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Per HellKnowz. The new sources added do not establish notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knight rider best (talk • contribs) 07:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * — Knight rider best (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete as non-notable. I've looked at this before and I can't find any reliable, independent sources (like WP:VG/RS) with significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Mobygames doesn't list any printed sources of the time either (although it's not excluded there could be). — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the new sources added and none pass significant coverage bar, they are simple generic description/overview entries with no critical evaluation. Furthermore, none of the sites appear to be reliable sources and they don't provide any editorial process or overview to suggest otherwise. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hold on - I just got in touch with the guy behind the studio that made the game about any media coverage he was aware of; There is www.old-games.com/download/2886/star-quest-i-in-the (I'm hitting the blacklist but cannot find why), of dubious reliability, but more importantly, reviewed in PC Gamer (an obviously reliable dedicated magazine), and was even included on one of their demo CDs, and some other contemporary publications. I'm trying to find more information about these sources, so don't kill this one just yet. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  23:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Obvious merge to the article on the company that made the game, Virtual Adventures Inc.. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * And there is coverage of the game in various sources including PC Games, July 96 issue. It just makes more sense to cover it as part of the article on the company that makes the game (and others). Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no coverage of the company itself, only of its notable product. It should be merged here if anywhere. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  00:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.