Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Sisterz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  11:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Star Sisterz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence this meets WP:GNG, a quick check for reliable sources turn up nothing. Only found blogs, press releases and passing mentions in a quick google check. Delete Secret account 06:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I've found that there's a book spin-off series, so I'll see if there's any mention of the books enough to warrant an article keep. I agree though, this is pretty slim pickings as far as sources go.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I'm unsure of the notability of Kidsworld.com, but I know that KidzWorld is supposed to be reliable and there are reviews from the School Library Journal and coverage by Seattle PI. I did see some other articles in the news archive, but they were hidden by a paywall. So far the books seem to have gotten a better reception than the game has. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not a notable game or product. Made no impact at all and there simply doesn't seem to be anything verifiable and encyclopedic to say about it other than it was a product that was released and that's pretty much it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.