Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek/temp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Move to user space. Tyrenius 16:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek/temp
redundant but exception to general merge procedure

This is a duplicate article, and so merging would be the standard course. This particular page seems to be an exception to the rule. It has become rather large and a merge would be a nontrivial endeavor. My main concern is that a merge will never take place.

The content of this page would not seem to be so different from the original as to add significant/salient info. Meanwhile, both pages exist in competition. I suggest that the article be deleted in order to remove the redundancy from Wikipedia, and dedicated editors save off this page's contents to their hard drives and trickle the info into the main article. --Ling.Nut 04:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I suggest moving the article to User:AllyUnion/Star Trek. The article seems to be AllyUnion's test page for Star Trek, thus it shouldn't be in the Wikipedia mainspace.--TBC TaLk?!? 04:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment As TBC says, it should simply be moved to the User space... Localzuk (talk) 11:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to User:AllyUnion/Star Trek per TBC. -- Nish kid 64 17:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree; instead of deleting this should be moved... I have emailed AllyUnion --Ling.Nut 20:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to User:AllyUnion/Star Trek if the user wants it. This has been somewhat of a long-term revision project and a number of changes have been incorporated into the main article, but I feel the creator of the Temp page should determine if there's any further use in keeping it around. 23skidoo 00:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Move. Been away for a long while.  --AllyUnion (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.