Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: A New Beginning (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek: A New Beginning
Delete Non-notable fan film and vanity listing. Google search still brings up only a handful of hits, nearly all related to the listing on Wikipedia. Filmmakers also hosting film on Wikipedia, in violation of WP:NOT.MikeWazowski 20:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Original nomination transcluded debate from first AfD for this article. Moved nom and existing vote to new page.
 * Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete fanfic movie. I can't WP:V the Wired Claims and as stated in nom, Google hits are primarily from wikipedia article.  No evidence of notability.  Furthermore, hosting their film on Wikimedia is just bad form.--Isotope23 20:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm pretty sure Wired and/or Wired News have never written about this project. They did cover an unrelated project called New Voyages a while back, but that was substantially more notable. No vote. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Isotope -- Ruby  21:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. savidan(talk) (e@) 21:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fan films are a tiny bit more notable than fanfic, but not by much. Note to closing admin: please delete the WP-hosted movie file as well, it's massive and we don't want to give the impression that WP is a free file hosting service. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. Stifle 22:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; the article also has the potential to cause confusion since I believe this is one of the rumored titles for the rumored Star Trek XI. 23skidoo 15:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons above. PJM 15:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.