Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operations 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, much of the text is a slightly reworded cut-and-paste copyright violation, and there are no references after all this time to show that this mod is notable or has any significant 3rd party coverage. Steve (Stephen)talk 05:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a copyvio from http://www.fleetops.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3&Itemid=25  . V .  [Talk 04:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

''Note this is the second AfD for this article. The first AfD result was no consensus in October 2006.'' (added by Pakman044 21:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC))


 * Keep - the game itself warrants an article, but you may want to try . It seems to have been paraphrased, but as it gives no credit it is a CV. ALTON   .ıl  04:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Query: Are you sure? It doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB.  . V .  [Talk 04:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * This doesn't appear to be a game, but rather just a mod created by fans. I have no opinion at this second, but I would have voted Keep if this had been an actual game rather than a fan created mod. TJ Spyke 07:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What about merging and shrinking with Star Trek: Armada II? The material is probably relevant to the Armada II article, but probably isn't enough to stand on its own.  Someone may need to spend time on the merging and shrinking, especially severing the copyvioed material. –Pakman044 21:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to have notibility. WP:WEB failure. Include comment in Star Trek: Armada II and delete.--Dacium 22:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - Article has been revised since AfD was opened 217.243.204.195 08:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Still seems that there are no cites for relevancy. Most of the additions look like fancruft.  . V .  [Talk 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep and mark as . 62.104.220.74
 * Delete per nom. ~ G1ggy!  Reply 23:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.