Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek Gamers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Star Trek Gamers

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

An article about an unnotable fan-site about Star Trek video games. I'm not finding a single reliable source that discusses the site in any meaningful way. Their only actual claim to fame that they make in this article is that another Star Trek fansite gave them an award, and that is hardly notable. This could almost qualify as a straight out Speedy Deletion under criteria A7, but as this article has been here for about five years, I figured it was better to take this to AFD for a consensus. Rorshacma (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete & Merge - Merge basic data into History of Star Trek games maybe into a STgamers section. By itself it look like and reads like an ad. I like Trek, but Wiki is Wiki and not an end all of everything out there.  "Live long and prosper." Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions . — Frankie (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources found, and nothing of value to merge. It's merely a fansite. If it had coverage from reliable sources then I'd consider a possible merge. --Teancum (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and Oppose merge as there is no significant coverage abotut his site to establish notability and there is no sourced content to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.