Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars: Legacy of the Sith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 07:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars: Legacy of the Sith
I'd be surprised if the book even exists. First of all, Galactic Standard Time is measured relative to the Battle of Yavin, not Anakin's death. Secondly, the most current books take place about 30 years ABY; I highly doubt something taking place some 3000 years after that would be approved. Delete. Firestorm 21:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pretty much no information on the subject in question other than the book is going to be written....No other information on it. G2 Wolf 22:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find information on this book, unlike most upcoming Star Wars novels. In addition, things often change; for example, Michael Stackpole's Dark Tide series was supposed to be a trilogy but became a duology instead. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, yadda yadda :) -Rebelguys2 22:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable speculation. Re-create if/when it's published. -Colin Kimbrell 22:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There's a Legacy of the Force series, set about 37 ABY. There's a Legacy of the Jedi novel, set in Count Dooku's youth. There's no evidence on StarWars.com concerning a "... Sith" novel, no novel yet has been set that far forward in the 'history', and a brief Google search for the author comes up mostly with a thirteen year old peace 'activist'. Unverifiable at best, fan-fic more likely. Delete. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 22:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Speculation. WP is not a crystal ball. -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_England.svg|25px|UK]] 23:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Premature. Wait till a publishing date has been announced. Looks like others have been unable to verify such a book is in progress, otherwise I'd suggest adding a line to whatever article covers licensed Star Wars fiction, but by the look of Saberwyn's comments, appears to be unverifiable right now. 23skidoo 01:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost certainly untrue. If it's verified, than it can stay. -LtNOWIS 02:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 12:24Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.