Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars: The Last of the Jedi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Last of the Jedi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

See maintenance tags. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jude Watson, should probably still have a bit of a blurb but it doesn't appear to be notable enough for a stand-alone page. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 04:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Especially considering each book has its own individual article. Could probably merge a lot of them or just straight redirect depending on quality of sourcing. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The book titles in the Jude Watson article all redirect here, so it does not seem to be the case that "each book has its own individual article". Or did I miss them? Daranios (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Nope! A lot of series have individual articles for each book, so I just saw the live links and assumed. Thank you for the correction! Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - without stating any preference, I am compelled to say that after going to article to check those tags, I was drawn into reading it (article) in its entirety - as someone who didn't know about the work, I found it interesting.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  18:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jude Watson or keep: None of the tags as such are a reason for deletion, but rather the indicated problems should be fixed through editing. The main question is if there are secondary sources which provide enough information so they can be fixed, as a proper WP:BEFORE search would show, which should be done prior to the nomination. In our case, such a search should include the individual books, as they are put together here in a summary article on the series in accordance with WP:ATD-M. This and this article have some relevant content. Popular Series Fiction for Middle School and Teen Readers is indicated by Google books to have content, but I don't have access. Is there more? Daranios (talk) 12:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per WP:Deletion is not cleanup. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I think the series is just about notable enough per WP:NBOOKS and per Thebiguglyalien, WP:DINC. Though the article does need significant help because it does seem to be little more than plot summaries at present. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep needs some cleanup and additional information, not deletion.  TITAN O SAURUS  05:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.