Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars Battlefront III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Star Wars Battlefront III

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP is not a crystal ball. Unsourced speculative information. Speedied before, but recreated, so let's get an official AFD behind keeping it deleted until such a time as well sourced information is availible. TexasAndroid 13:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going to be bold and declare a snow delete per this one line:"Please keep in mind that this game has yet to even be officially announced by LucasArts or Free Radical, and all of this information is speculative."Whsitchy 14:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keeping it in mind. Speedy delete.  tomasz.  15:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I say to delete or sandbox it until there is enough verifiable information on the game to justify an article. Hellswasteland 17:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, purely as self-admitted crystalballery. Hooboy. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Force is not strong in this one. Cheers, Lanky ( TALK ) 13:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Look at the IMAGE ON THE PAGE!! Sanchmarc ( TALK ) 2:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. According to that image's usage rationale, it was created by user:Sanchmarc and therefore represents no change to this article's crystalballery per the fact "that this game has yet to even be officially announced by LucasArts or Free Radical, and all of this information is speculative".  tomasz.  07:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I looked at the image on the page. Very pretty.  My !vote stands as delete. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I looked at the image, and then I looked at the image history, on which you said, "I JUST WISH IT REALLY CAME OUT!!!". That was two days ago.  Care to explain why this is notable now, and why you want us to keep it? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Speculation, as per above.  Maintainerzero 19:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply. WELL, I DON'T MIND THE PAGE BEING DELETED, BUT THE IMAGE I'LL KEEP MYSELF FOR USES! =) If Anyone Wants to Use It, GIVE ME CREDIT BABY!Sanchmarc ( TALK ) 11:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Duplicate vote. (User already expressed himself previously on this AFD.) - TexasAndroid 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm a little unclear. Is this permissable use of the imaging system? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 16:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Reply. You Never Really Know if This Game will Really Come Out So I Myself will eventually keep the Image for Now. If it's Deleted, It's Deleted....I Won't Leave the Image on Wikipedia for Sure So... I'll Leave it on My Comp.. Sanchmarc
 * Delete All mentions about this game on the search engine are purely speculative forum topics. This implies crystalballing on the article's behalf.--Kylohk 09:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, here's the skinny, Sanchmarc. No, we don't know if the game is coming out - which is why it's brought here in the first place.  Speculation of the release of the game is what I like to call "crystalballery", which I loosely define as dubious predictions of future events with no concrete information saying that this will definitely happen (such as, say, an article about the thirteenth sequel to the Police Academy series of films) - and one really important thing that WP is not is a crystal ball. I won't delete the image, it's up to someone else as far as I'm concerned.  Thanks for your understanding. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.