Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star wars (fan film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 23:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Star wars (fan film)


Non-notable fan-made remake of Star Wars IV. --Nehwyn 11:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear conflict of interest as per the "proof" link on the article. Even crosses the line close to spam. --Brad Beattie (talk) 11:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails to assert notability. If this is internet content, please tag with db-web. Thanks. MER-C 12:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spammy and no assertion of notability. Prolog 14:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable film, fancruft. --Ter e nce Ong (C 15:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fan-made film, no verification from external reliable sources to establish notability, Wikipedia is not a crystal-ball (as this has not even been filmed yet), Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, Doesn't come close to WP:WEB guidelines for web content, it essentially violates WP:SPAM, need I go on? The video plea to save the article does win "most desperate thing I've ever seen anyone do to save an article" though; even if it does violate WP:EL.--Isotope23 20:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: As the film is not notable and still has not been released I have to say delete. Almost seems like spam to me. Orfen  User Talk | Contribs 04:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete current content and redirect to Star Wars fan films. Wavy G 04:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Yamaguchi先生 05:45, 9 November 2006

I don't think is article needs to be deleted just yet, but it does need a lot more information. What film organization is producing this movie? Where is its official website? Is it even listed on fanfilms.net? If these can be answered, then it could remain, otherwise, it should be deletedMaraJade85 04:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, none of those matter one bit. It still fails WP:WEB. Obvious Delete. IrishGuy talk 03:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - absolutely non-notable. TheRealFennShysa 01:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.