Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star wars titanium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Star wars titanium

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a discriminate collection of information. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 03:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Great toys, but this list is NN and trivial. Delete. Spawn Man 04:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, the article is a list of complete trivia. --Darkwind (talk) 04:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Trivia.--Danaman5 05:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nominator. Indiscriminate collection of items that has no notability established. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 07:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I remember these, and I guess they were successful if that many "waves" came out, but this is more of a spreadsheet than an article, and bordering on trivial anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete trivia, virtually no actual content. WP:NOT. Hut 8.5 19:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 21:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Non-encyclopedic and unsourced list. I can just glean enough context to keep it out of the realm of speedy deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 06:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.