Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starboy Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wizkid (musician). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Starboy Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:GNG. The record label has not gained significant coverage to warrant a stand alone article.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 23:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Now either this one is notable, or we have a real problem with non-notable record labels. I was looking through List of record labels: 0–9 and found 13th Floor Records and 1M1 Records. I looked through List of Pakistani record labels and found Planet Records. These appear to be even less notable than Starboy Entertainment. I think if we delete this one, we will need to go through the lists of "notable" record labels and purge a lot of them, since one in ten that I looked at did not appear to be notable. -- RM 02:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wizkid (musician) where it is already covered. Lacks independent notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect at best perhaps then, certainly not yet convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  04:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.