Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starckdeutsch


 * STARCKDEUTSCH - obscure conlang? Dysprosia 09:54, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * Talking with author to try and improve. Dysprosia 10:21, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * And I doubt that Mathias Koeppel is worth keeping - should be incorporated into that Starckdeutsch if that one stays. andy 11:43, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * With the changes that have been made, Starckdeutsch seems worth keeping. I am in favor of deleting Mathias Koeppel, though. It's only one fact, and that fact is already mentioned in the Starckdeutsch article. Andre Engels 13:50, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * Delete. BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 16:26, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * 130 google hits, moderately interesting content. Needs editing. If Dysprosia can vouch for the accuracy and verifiability of the content then keep. Otherwise delete. Martin 16:39, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think its interesting.
 * I do agree the changes have improved Starckdeutsch (albeit a paragraph's worth of copied text), however I still can't find a lot of content on the language itself. I don't speak German, unfortunately, so I can't decipher some of the stuff on Koeppel's website - I'm leaning a little towards a "keep" though. Dysprosia 09:26, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)