Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starhaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Neil  ☎  11:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Starhaven

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fancruft not notable outside of the DC Comics universe, cannot be cited per WP:RS Pilotbob 04:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Artw 02:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Question - What exactly is meant by "cannot be cited per WP:RS"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artw (talk • contribs) 03:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as article has neither primary or secondary sources that are reliable WP:RS. Fansites are the only ghits; I am no comic expert, but I do not think this fictional planet has any fictional notability as would be evidenced by secondary sources.--Gavin Collins 08:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Provisional Keep - it would be more accurate to say article isn't yet supported by reliable secondary sources, unless one knows absolutely that it isn't referenced anywhere, which I doubt. However, I can and do think that if it does not produce such sources shortly, the content should be merged to the Dawnstar article. Propose that the article be kept for a period, and that it be renominated in three months if sources are not placed in the interim. John Carter 22:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I propose it be deleted until sources are found. SolidPlaid 00:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.