Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starkey International Institute for Household Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. There's no real notability here other than someone trying to portray the institute or its management in a bad light, with BLP in mind and notability iffy at best (I think it falls below WP:N & WP:CORP, but even if it just passes, BLP issues outweigh a "just pass") deletion is proper. If we cannot write a BLP-compliant NPOV article better none at all. Carlossuarez46 04:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Starkey International Institute for Household Management

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

User:Kintetsubuffalo tagged it and , but it merely contains what may be fair criticism that someone in its management may be objecting to. Anthony Appleyard 10:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually, I tagged it because it brought up "criticisms", but did not say what those criticisms were, nor sourced them. So I don't know who in their management you are referring to, but be careful where you sling that. Chris 15:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The criticisms are sourced by the Warner article--the footnote simply isnt there. Considering our BLP rules, the article is properly non-specific. DGG (talk) 19:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.