Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starmin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Starmin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable anime, unreferenced, no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested by creator. Empty Buffer (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Empty Buffer (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Strong suspicion of "Hoax" by a single purpose account as Verifiability isn't meet. Will change my mind if evidences of existence are found. --KrebMarkt (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * No, not a hoax -- wishful thinking. Specifically, the part where the article says "is an american anime" when they meant to use a future tense (and possibly a subjunctive mode as well) -- it takes a while to weed out the other Starmins in the g-hits, but eventually you can find that this is an amateur project by a fan forum -- judging by the art quality, very amateur. It has not been filmed, let alone broadcast, and is not referenced by any reliable references, and so is not a notable TV series = delete. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete "Fan project" is no better than a WP:HOAX, and clearly unnotable self-advertisement and spam. Rapid delete. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 14:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not the place to publish your personal fiction. —Farix (t &#124; c) 15:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete This does not belong on wiki per WP:NFT and per above. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong, speedy, superlative delete. --erachima talk 03:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * There is no need to be rude. Some kid just made a simple mistake, not understanding how Wikipedia worked.  I already posted on the person's talk page  telling them where this sort of thing can be published at, there a special wiki just for people to upload their own work for it.   D r e a m Focus  07:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, unfortunately that is the case with most Wikipedians. Delete per above, no reliable resources, nothing on line, WP:MADEUP, WP:NFT, WP:HOAX and a lot of other stuff. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.