Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starmind International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Starmind International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has no more than a few trivial mentions as its sources. Google Books and News turn up nothing, and Search only turns up pages which are not worthy of being sources. It appears to meet neither WP:GNG nor WP:CORP, because all we know is that it is a partner of various organizations, far from a complete article. The page reflects that. Wer900 talkessay on the definition of consensus 03:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 31.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  04:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Please note that additional important sources have been added to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Freyman (talk • contribs) 09:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: the article doesn't allow to get an idea of what is its topic notable for. It completely fails to demonstrate the significant impact this company had on the humanity. If there actually is something to write article about (which doesn't seem to be the case), the already existing content can only make the process more difficult. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.