Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starpoint Gemini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn. (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Starpoint Gemini

 * – ( View AfD View log )

unremarkable video game produced by a non-notable company, lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Secondary sources are in the article, fully satisfies WP:GNG. Developer's notability is irrelevant per WP:NOTINHERITED. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It's got secondary sources but are they reliable?--RadioFan (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Gamer.no has a great news article, Gamez.nl review, RockPaperShotgun 1 2 3, ComputerGames.ro, Gamers.at, PC Powerplay April 2011 issue, Gamershell 1 2, RPGWatch, GameCorner.pl news item. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.