Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starrfucker Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Starrfucker Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:GNG. CharlieEchoTango (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched and couldn't find any sources to show that this magazine is notable at this point in time. It's a fairly new magazine, only having been out for about a year and only having 4 issues, so I think it's just too soon for an article to be added at this point in time. If this is deleted, the article creator might want to look into userfying the article until the point in time where there's enough reliable sources to warrant an article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Speedy delete No claim to notability. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 09:18, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.